<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plone is a Product &#8482;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stopmebeforeiblogagain.com/plone-is-a-product-tm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stopmebeforeiblogagain.com/plone-is-a-product-tm/</link>
	<description>I am Vidar &#34;blacktar&#34; Andersen and I can&#039;t blog. This is my soapbox.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 10:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vidar Andersen</title>
		<link>http://stopmebeforeiblogagain.com/plone-is-a-product-tm/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Vidar Andersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopmebeforeiblogagain.com/plone-is-a-product-tm/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I think of it this way: How do I market and sell a platform? 

When I think about platform vs product in my world (read: in an non-tech executive and decision maker setting), I can&#039;t really say that &quot;a platform&quot; springs to mind as a reoccurring topic. 

I would argue it is easier for non-tech centered people understand and accept &quot;a product&quot; as opposed to &quot;a platform&quot;.

Plone is a Content Management System that is ready out of the box. It has great security, work flow, accessibility and languages support built right in. That&#039;s definitely properties of an understandable and marketable product.

That you can use the product Plone as a starting point to expand and evolve from is to me inherit properties of the product Plone (TM) and not the other way around. I would argue that products have the inherit possibility to be a platform, but not necessarily vice versa. 

Some other thoughts about Product vs Platform:
http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2007/09/every-product-i.html
http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/kevinmcguire/2007/08/17/platform-product-floor-wax-the-solution-exists/
http://sam.curren.ws/index.cfm/2006/11/9/Platform-vs-Product</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think of it this way: How do I market and sell a platform? </p>
<p>When I think about platform vs product in my world (read: in an non-tech executive and decision maker setting), I can&#8217;t really say that &#8220;a platform&#8221; springs to mind as a reoccurring topic. </p>
<p>I would argue it is easier for non-tech centered people understand and accept &#8220;a product&#8221; as opposed to &#8220;a platform&#8221;.</p>
<p>Plone is a Content Management System that is ready out of the box. It has great security, work flow, accessibility and languages support built right in. That&#8217;s definitely properties of an understandable and marketable product.</p>
<p>That you can use the product Plone as a starting point to expand and evolve from is to me inherit properties of the product Plone (TM) and not the other way around. I would argue that products have the inherit possibility to be a platform, but not necessarily vice versa. </p>
<p>Some other thoughts about Product vs Platform:<br />
<a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2007/09/every-product-i.html" rel="nofollow">http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2007/09/every-product-i.html</a><br />
<a href="http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/kevinmcguire/2007/08/17/platform-product-floor-wax-the-solution-exists/" rel="nofollow">http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/kevinmcguire/2007/08/17/platform-product-floor-wax-the-solution-exists/</a><br />
<a href="http://sam.curren.ws/index.cfm/2006/11/9/Platform-vs-Product" rel="nofollow">http://sam.curren.ws/index.cfm/2006/11/9/Platform-vs-Product</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vidar Andersen</title>
		<link>http://stopmebeforeiblogagain.com/plone-is-a-product-tm/comment-page-1/#comment-11135</link>
		<dc:creator>Vidar Andersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopmebeforeiblogagain.com/plone-is-a-product-tm/#comment-11135</guid>
		<description>I think of it this way: How do I market and sell a platform? 

When I think about platform vs product in my world (read: in an non-tech executive and decision maker setting), I can&#039;t really say that &quot;a platform&quot; springs to mind as a reoccurring topic. 

I would argue it is easier for non-tech centered people understand and accept &quot;a product&quot; as opposed to &quot;a platform&quot;.

Plone is a Content Management System that is ready out of the box. It has great security, work flow, accessibility and languages support built right in. That&#039;s definitely properties of an understandable and marketable product.

That you can use the product Plone as a starting point to expand and evolve from is to me inherit properties of the product Plone (TM) and not the other way around. I would argue that products have the inherit possibility to be a platform, but not necessarily vice versa. 

Some other thoughts about Product vs Platform:
http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2007/09/every-product-i.html
http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/kevinmcguire/2007/08/17/platform-product-floor-wax-the-solution-exists/
http://sam.curren.ws/index.cfm/2006/11/9/Platform-vs-Product</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think of it this way: How do I market and sell a platform? </p>
<p>When I think about platform vs product in my world (read: in an non-tech executive and decision maker setting), I can&#8217;t really say that &#8220;a platform&#8221; springs to mind as a reoccurring topic. </p>
<p>I would argue it is easier for non-tech centered people understand and accept &#8220;a product&#8221; as opposed to &#8220;a platform&#8221;.</p>
<p>Plone is a Content Management System that is ready out of the box. It has great security, work flow, accessibility and languages support built right in. That&#8217;s definitely properties of an understandable and marketable product.</p>
<p>That you can use the product Plone as a starting point to expand and evolve from is to me inherit properties of the product Plone (TM) and not the other way around. I would argue that products have the inherit possibility to be a platform, but not necessarily vice versa. </p>
<p>Some other thoughts about Product vs Platform:<br />
<a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2007/09/every-product-i.html" rel="nofollow">http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2007/09/every-product-i.html</a><br />
<a href="http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/kevinmcguire/2007/08/17/platform-product-floor-wax-the-solution-exists/" rel="nofollow">http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/kevinmcguire/2007/08/17/platform-product-floor-wax-the-solution-exists/</a><br />
<a href="http://sam.curren.ws/index.cfm/2006/11/9/Platform-vs-Product" rel="nofollow">http://sam.curren.ws/index.cfm/2006/11/9/Platform-vs-Product</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vidar Andersen</title>
		<link>http://stopmebeforeiblogagain.com/plone-is-a-product-tm/comment-page-1/#comment-11136</link>
		<dc:creator>Vidar Andersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopmebeforeiblogagain.com/plone-is-a-product-tm/#comment-11136</guid>
		<description>I think of it this way: How do I market and sell a platform? 

When I think about platform vs product in my world (read: in an non-tech executive and decision maker setting), I can&#039;t really say that &quot;a platform&quot; springs to mind as a reoccurring topic. 

I would argue it is easier for non-tech centered people understand and accept &quot;a product&quot; as opposed to &quot;a platform&quot;.

Plone is a Content Management System that is ready out of the box. It has great security, work flow, accessibility and languages support built right in. That&#039;s definitely properties of an understandable and marketable product.

That you can use the product Plone as a starting point to expand and evolve from is to me inherit properties of the product Plone (TM) and not the other way around. I would argue that products have the inherit possibility to be a platform, but not necessarily vice versa. 

Some other thoughts about Product vs Platform:
http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2007/09/every-product-i.html
http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/kevinmcguire/2007/08/17/platform-product-floor-wax-the-solution-exists/
http://sam.curren.ws/index.cfm/2006/11/9/Platform-vs-Product</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think of it this way: How do I market and sell a platform? </p>
<p>When I think about platform vs product in my world (read: in an non-tech executive and decision maker setting), I can&#8217;t really say that &#8220;a platform&#8221; springs to mind as a reoccurring topic. </p>
<p>I would argue it is easier for non-tech centered people understand and accept &#8220;a product&#8221; as opposed to &#8220;a platform&#8221;.</p>
<p>Plone is a Content Management System that is ready out of the box. It has great security, work flow, accessibility and languages support built right in. That&#8217;s definitely properties of an understandable and marketable product.</p>
<p>That you can use the product Plone as a starting point to expand and evolve from is to me inherit properties of the product Plone (TM) and not the other way around. I would argue that products have the inherit possibility to be a platform, but not necessarily vice versa. </p>
<p>Some other thoughts about Product vs Platform:<br />
<a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2007/09/every-product-i.html" rel="nofollow">http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2007/09/every-product-i.html</a><br />
<a href="http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/kevinmcguire/2007/08/17/platform-product-floor-wax-the-solution-exists/" rel="nofollow">http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/kevinmcguire/2007/08/17/platform-product-floor-wax-the-solution-exists/</a><br />
<a href="http://sam.curren.ws/index.cfm/2006/11/9/Platform-vs-Product" rel="nofollow">http://sam.curren.ws/index.cfm/2006/11/9/Platform-vs-Product</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Scholz</title>
		<link>http://stopmebeforeiblogagain.com/plone-is-a-product-tm/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Scholz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopmebeforeiblogagain.com/plone-is-a-product-tm/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Well, I sort of have a problem with seeing Plone as a Product. This product would then be a CMS. But isn&#039;t that limiting things quite a bit?

I mean, I am writing some GTD application with it, it can easily be used as underlying framework for most social networks and so on.. That&#039;s why I really see it more as a platform.. And the whole component story speaks for the platform approach, too.

(actually earlier I would have called it sort of a distribution but these days most products seem to be part of Plone core so that&#039;s maybe not so true anymore).

Nothing to add to the &quot;Plone is _you_&quot;! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I sort of have a problem with seeing Plone as a Product. This product would then be a CMS. But isn&#8217;t that limiting things quite a bit?</p>
<p>I mean, I am writing some GTD application with it, it can easily be used as underlying framework for most social networks and so on.. That&#8217;s why I really see it more as a platform.. And the whole component story speaks for the platform approach, too.</p>
<p>(actually earlier I would have called it sort of a distribution but these days most products seem to be part of Plone core so that&#8217;s maybe not so true anymore).</p>
<p>Nothing to add to the &#8220;Plone is _you_&#8221;! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Scholz</title>
		<link>http://stopmebeforeiblogagain.com/plone-is-a-product-tm/comment-page-1/#comment-11133</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Scholz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopmebeforeiblogagain.com/plone-is-a-product-tm/#comment-11133</guid>
		<description>Well, I sort of have a problem with seeing Plone as a Product. This product would then be a CMS. But isn&#039;t that limiting things quite a bit?

I mean, I am writing some GTD application with it, it can easily be used as underlying framework for most social networks and so on.. That&#039;s why I really see it more as a platform.. And the whole component story speaks for the platform approach, too.

(actually earlier I would have called it sort of a distribution but these days most products seem to be part of Plone core so that&#039;s maybe not so true anymore).

Nothing to add to the &quot;Plone is _you_&quot;! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I sort of have a problem with seeing Plone as a Product. This product would then be a CMS. But isn&#8217;t that limiting things quite a bit?</p>
<p>I mean, I am writing some GTD application with it, it can easily be used as underlying framework for most social networks and so on.. That&#8217;s why I really see it more as a platform.. And the whole component story speaks for the platform approach, too.</p>
<p>(actually earlier I would have called it sort of a distribution but these days most products seem to be part of Plone core so that&#8217;s maybe not so true anymore).</p>
<p>Nothing to add to the &#8220;Plone is _you_&#8221;! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Scholz</title>
		<link>http://stopmebeforeiblogagain.com/plone-is-a-product-tm/comment-page-1/#comment-11134</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Scholz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopmebeforeiblogagain.com/plone-is-a-product-tm/#comment-11134</guid>
		<description>Well, I sort of have a problem with seeing Plone as a Product. This product would then be a CMS. But isn&#039;t that limiting things quite a bit?

I mean, I am writing some GTD application with it, it can easily be used as underlying framework for most social networks and so on.. That&#039;s why I really see it more as a platform.. And the whole component story speaks for the platform approach, too.

(actually earlier I would have called it sort of a distribution but these days most products seem to be part of Plone core so that&#039;s maybe not so true anymore).

Nothing to add to the &quot;Plone is _you_&quot;! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I sort of have a problem with seeing Plone as a Product. This product would then be a CMS. But isn&#8217;t that limiting things quite a bit?</p>
<p>I mean, I am writing some GTD application with it, it can easily be used as underlying framework for most social networks and so on.. That&#8217;s why I really see it more as a platform.. And the whole component story speaks for the platform approach, too.</p>
<p>(actually earlier I would have called it sort of a distribution but these days most products seem to be part of Plone core so that&#8217;s maybe not so true anymore).</p>
<p>Nothing to add to the &#8220;Plone is _you_&#8221;! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

